These past few weeks stand out for me because of some of the unique and fascinating conversations that I have been able to have with Syrians both in the research for my thesis and in the course of my every day curiosities. As my Arabic has improved over these months, my ability to really understand people’s points of views and to communicate my own has made the whole experience of being abroad increasingly enjoyable from the perspective of intercultural interaction. I have met wonderful people here in Syria who I respect for their intelligence and ideas, though between our points of view lies centuries of change, the enlightenment, and the Atlantic Ocean. But if respectful disagreement or conflicting points of view is the rule, there are certainly a few exceptions. However, these exceptions can be revealing and potent examples of the utterly different (and perhaps incompatible) way in which different people view the world.
Primary among these is religion. As my Arabic has improved I have finally grown comfortable disclosing my doubts about religion to those who have none. Religion is everywhere here, it penetrates all parts of daily life; even people’s everyday speech is accented by invocations of God’s praise, damnation, or will. Thus it is not surprising that it comes up incessantly in conversation. I was baptized Catholic and have celebrated Christmas almost every year since I was born, but when people here persist in religious discussion, I have become increasingly forthcoming with my thoughts. The mock impersonation of religiosity, of pretending to be someone I am not, of the veiling in duress my own ideas in the doubt of cultural misunderstanding, makes me feel ever a stranger among people I know well. Honest conversation with my friends and acquaintances here has been both liberating and enlightening.
I had a fascinating talk about religion with Zilal, a 30-year-old Muslim women who is studying for her masters and lives in my dorm. She traveled with our group to Damascus last weekend; on the way back to Aleppo we stopped for a visit in the mountain village of Maloula, a small town carved into a sheer mountain stretching in broken angles to the upper plateau of a great mountain spine, accentuated by several famous monasteries and churches which are carved into holy sites in these crags. It is a holy site for Christians and Muslims alike, and our discussion began as we followed a narrow canyon up to the highest of the churches. The canyon, to my eyes, had been carved by water, with the recognizable marks of kettle holing and smoothed edges indicative of countless years of wear beyond our ability to fathom. Zilal, like many Syrians, believed in the miracle that is supposed to have happened here, that God opened this gap in the mountains so that a maiden, despised by her father for becoming a Christian in the time of polytheism, could retreat into the hills, and escape his wrath. For her, and many Syrians, a literal interpretation of these stories is crucial, and the “pick and choose” form of religion is not religion at all but heresy.
On explaining the story to me (though I’d heard this one before, its famous here) she asked me if I believed it. I said I thought that it was metaphorical, perhaps that it was a fable to extol the virtues of faith in the face of persecution, but she wouldn’t have it. None of our Syrian travel companions would (Muhammad wasn’t around). Thus we descended into questions of religion and faith. She explained to me that all good came from God, and thus that non-believers were incapable of doing good. Everything she did, she continued, was for God and thus all the good in her life was by and for Him. I pointed out that perhaps I was the one really doing good, as when I did something good it wasn’t for the expectation of a posthumous prize-basket from the heavens but simply because I knew it was the right thing to do. It is not good, she replied, unless it is done for God. She said that until I found God I wouldn’t be happy. I said that I had found God, in a way, in my wonder at the mysteries and awesomeness of the universe, and that this wonder for me gave me the same happiness and security that she derived from God. If we both derive the same wonder and amazement from these forces in our lives, perhaps these forces are two manifestations of the same awesome power, or for me, the same fathomless mystery.
This is a string of the conversation I was obliged to continue with my Arabic Literature professor, an accomplished and respected man of impressive learning, formidable presence, and the graceful natural authority of true charisma. In analysis of some Aleppan folktales he grew curious and asked the class if they believed in the Abrahamic God. As proof of God’s existence, the professor went into the traditional argument about the complexity of humans, surely something this complex needed an intelligent and actively involved maker. Then he continued to the complexity of the solar system. He explained how God moves Earth closer to the sun to give us summer and farther from the sun to give us winter; this was solely the diligence of divine master, he explained, as when Earth got close to the sun, God would speed it up so the sun wouldn’t grab it. Likewise, when Earth would get too far away it should keep going but God would stop it and bring it back to the sun for another warm summer. I am not bringing this up to make fun of anyone, much less a charismatic literature professor, but I believe this example is incredibly instructive.
In all his long years of life this man had never been made to wonder why the Northern hemisphere has summer when the Southern has winter. He had never been forced to consider the equator, and realize a tilting of the planet caused the seasons. He had never learned about Newton’s Laws, the three wonderfully simple explanations of so much we see around us, and had never had an opportunity to apply them to the world around him. He had never been made to understand inertia or centripetal force or the very gravity that keeps him on the ground (gravity he prescribed to an active presence of God in keeping things in place). He had no understanding of what made the planets go around the sun, spinning in ellipses as their inertia and the sun’s gravity play the continuous game of tug of war, on the stalemate of which we all depend. For me, the beauty of this world, the God if you want to call it that, is that we are the probable outcome of an improbable equation, that of all the billions of billions of things that had to align for Earth and humanity to work out, they did. I explained my views to the Professor, prefaced by a quick run-through of physics and astronomy, that the mind must be used in all things to discover the true nature of the universe and of God.
How fundamentally different are the mentalities and attitudes of my society and upbringing, and my professor’s? If an educated man can live his life without a basic understanding of the world, are Syrian children growing up using scientific principles to judge their own world? I believe it is utterly devastating to the human desire of wonder and discovery to hand people a one size fits all explanation. Science cannot explain everything, and is in no danger of it coming close anytime soon, and that is the beauty of it. My point is the very nature of that mentality is detrimental to the progression of society. If everything is in God’s hand, what reason does someone have to try to figure it out, unravel it, and make it better? If all good is only for God, what obligation do we have to each other? What obligation do we have to our fragile planet that teeters precariously on the precipice that science and technology have brought it to, and certainly science and technology can only save it from? Truly, this is not a question which people here are asking them selves. I believe they must find a way to move past belief to their common human interests.
This same logic extends to many Syrian’s perceptions towards the other people. I had an interesting conversation this past weekend at Connaitre (a city in the Golan region of Syria which the Israelis destroyed as they retreated) at a “martyrs” graveyard. The program director, an educated man who taught in the States for a number of years, and I were discussing the use of the term martyr and martyrdom. A Syrian Palestinian himself, he, like most Syrians is pro-Palestinian and believes that the Palestinians have been wronged and the world community needed to recognize this.
To that claim I could provide no objection, but I argued that they do themselves a disservice when they use the word martyr so broadly: for the Gazan girl killed in her bedroom by Israeli white-phosphorus, for the stone throwing Palestinian teenager killed in a protest, and the Palestinian terrorist who explodes himself in a crowded public place in Israel to kill civilians. I acknowledged that I understood where the suicide bomber’s rage was coming from, but his frustration and victimization did not excuse his heinous crime. Indeed, terrorists like this are called martyrs and honored as heroes. By this point in the conversation, we had gathered a group of maybe a dozen Syrians, mostly of our party, who were defending this egregious act. I purposefully avoided the use of suicide tactics against military targets, and focused on its most heinous incarnation, its use against civilians. I argued that no matter how many innocent people the Israeli army kills, killing an Israeli civilian is murder, inexcusable and savage, and that until they acknowledged this and renounced it, their plight would be a hard sell to Americans, which we all agreed held most of the cards in this situation.
To this point I was shocked to find the majority of these Syrian, all upper class members of the intellectual elite, did not believe there was such a thing as an Israeli civilian. “Every Israeli where’s a military jacket” said my Professor with alarming conviction, to which the group nodded in affirmation. The Palestinians have to fight with what they can, said another, “they are victims of injustice and oppression,” he said, and the group surged with affirmation. I asked again, for clarity, if an Israeli child leaves his mother’s womb wearing a military uniform. “Every Israeli” they replied. They said it was a situation that I could never understand as I had never been the victim of such oppression.
Of course, neither had they. Ironically, of the group (though it would be unwise for me to point it out there) I was the only one who’d ever been to their beloved Palestine, and in my time in Gaza I got taste, a potent and foul introduction, to the absolute atrocities committed by the Israeli’s in the name of their false security, a lingering taste which sticks in the gut and brings home just how incontrovertible and intractable the chasm is between the ideas and beliefs of the two sides. I think about these Syrians bred for a lifetime with ideals of hate for their neighbors to the south, and at the same time I think of Israel, I think of the pointless desecration of holy places, Israel’s destruction of medical facilities and schools, I think of the tracks left by Israeli tanks in a playground making plain that the tank backed up and made a second pass to flatten both the jungle gym and the swing set. What were IDF soldiers trained to do that their minds and hearts could be so twisted? How could a Syrian consider the murder of civilians anything but a crime? Why do the Israelis? And how can anyone expect to bridge the gap between these two hatreds that have been seeded from youth and redoubled by fear and doubt?
And yet, somehow, even among the greatest ignorance and reckless hate, freed minds and immutable spirits will not be snuffed out. I returned to the bus and a group of the Syrians, like children embarrassed by an alcoholic parent begging society’s forgiveness for a crime that was never theirs, apologized to me and asked me to make sure the other Americans knew that not all Syrians thought this way. They wanted peace, they wanted to move on, and murdering civilians, they said, would make them no better than the Israeli army. I told them that I knew Israelis who felt the same way, outraged by their government’s expansionism and belligerence, and that there are many Americans who understand that we play a key role in allowing Israel to shun making peace in favor of expansion.
Connaitre’s martyrdom graveyard was a somber place, more so in that, in my mind, the death of all these men had only fermented and solidified a lingering hatred. In a way, it was much the same at the October War Panorama Museum in Damascus the next day. In 1973 Syria and Egypt had some success in forcing Israeli armies back. This is, in the shared cultural memory of these societies, a victory ranking with Saladin’s opening of Jerusalem from the Crusaders hundreds of years before. Syria’s North Korean allies donated a beautiful museum with a 360 panorama of the battle like a life-size donut shaped diorama extolling the bravery and courage of the Syrian army in pushing back the Israelis. A few friends and I were there, along with a few classes of 5th graders. Through fuzzy speakers a recorded announcer narrated the battle and the history of the conflict from a dubious perspective. In truth, Lebanon’s Hezbollah museum takes the cake for expert propaganda, but I was disheartened to watch these innocent children being baptized in the hatreds of their parent’s generation. I am not discounting Syria’s situation. Part of Syria is occupied by a nuclear power that has in the past few years attacked Syrian soil as well as several of Syria’s close allies. From its position in the mountains south of Damascus it looks down on the Syrian capital, and for four decades the Syrians have tried to carry on their lives in the shadow of an enemy that watches them from within their own borders. Nevertheless, these kids were not on a field trip to learn about the complexities of international peacemaking, but to reinforce national sacrifice and the inhumanity of their enemies. Seeing how the IDF left Gaza, graffitiing walls and defecating in people’s beds, I can only imagine what young Israelis are being taught. It cannot be much different. In times like these I question the rationality and reason of our species.
Are we insane or blind? I wonder this often as an American. We punish Syria with a harsh barrage of sanctions until they renounce their ties with Hezbollah and Hamas and so on, and we support Israeli belligerence with our most generous foreign aid package. I am not sure for whom we are doing a favor? It is certainly neither in the interest of Syria nor Israel nor the U.S. It was the impression of the new American Ambassador to Syria that Syria is ready to make a peace, assuming the full return of occupied land to Syria. We met with the new Ambassador Ford in the embassy in Damascus. He was appointed in January as part of the reestablishment of diplomatic ties to Syria after the lull of the Bush years. He spoke to our small group of Americans and was able to speak surprisingly openly and honestly about Syria. He appears an earnest man trying to serve his country and Syria, two nations who need each other, and whose interests really do not need to clash as they often do.
Anyone who doubts that the U.S. needs to work with Syria underestimates the actors over-which they exert strong influence in the region, actors which the United States has a vested interest in engaging diplomatically; among these are Hamas, Hezbollah, and groups in Iraq, not to mention Syria’s own diplomatic engagement with Israel. The U.S. needs to work on its policies here, to deal with this region with an even hand to finally stand for the principles it preaches. As the rest of the Middle East falls apart, the influential political hand of Syria will be crucial in securing peace, cooperation, economic development and stability. This will only be reached by working with a strong political leadership in Damascus that can make unpopular decisions for the achievement of an elusive goal. I am not commenting on what I think this government wants. I am only saying that little in my discussions with most Syrians has made me think that they desire or believe themselves to be ready for political empowerment, or that a democracy would bring a brilliant partner for peace.
Syrians have witnessed the U.S. play its hand here for over half a century. We buttress a uncompromising expansionist theocracy as it exerts its will on its neighbors, we make allies of the most corrupt with no thought of their people, and our experiment in bringing democracy to Iraq is utterly ruinous. What are we doing here?